One of the main directions of the journal's policy is the publication of original articles that meet the standards of high scientific quality. The journal accepts research and review articles for publication.

Discussion articles are welcome.

The article is submitted to the editorial office of the journal through a personal account on the journal's website. Sending the article as a hard copy is not required!

All accompanying documents that contain a signature and/or seal are uploaded in scanned form.

To increase the "visibility" of authors, it is recommended that they submit their ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID)) IDs when submitting an article. http://www.orcid.org/).

When submitting an article, the author confirms that the article has not been published before and is under review in another journal. Simultaneous submission ("fan mail") of a manuscript to different journals is considered a serious violation of ethical standards. The identification of duplicated publications may lead to the refusal to accept the manuscripts of these authors, as well as to the retrogression (recall) of already published duplicated articles.

The language of the journal (we accept and publish articles) is Russian and English.

If the main language of the article is Russian, then the article must have an English translation of the title, abstract, keywords, and information about the author(s).

If the main language is English, then the article should have a Russian translation of the title, abstract, keywords, and information about the author(s).

Article review procedure

After receiving the article, it is reviewed (double-blind), then the editorial board gives a conclusion on the expediency of publishing the submitted message. The full review period is at least 1 month.

The structure of the article in Russian:

UDC code;
Last Name, First name, Patronymic, of the author(s);
Article title;
Abstract (200-250 words); the abstract should contain the following information: the purpose and objectives of scientific research; methodology and scientific approaches, the main results obtained; conclusions; originality / value of the data obtained; practical significance; direction of further research.
Keywords (5-7 words; separated from each other by semicolons);
Information about the author: Full name, academic degree (undergraduates, postgraduates, applicants indicate the university and department), position, place of work (city, organization, division), ORCID.
Contact information: includes postal business address, phone and e-mail;
Paragraphs 2-7 are also indicated in English.

The text of the article;
Illustrations and captions to them with the reflection of the name, dating, etc.;
A list of abbreviations (if any);
Literature (in Russian).
The structure of the article in English:

UDC code;
First name, patronymic, surname of the author(s);
Article title;
Abstract (200-250 words); the abstract should contain the following information: the purpose and objectives of scientific research; methodology and scientific approaches, the main results obtained; conclusions; originality / value of the data obtained; practical significance; direction of further research.
Keywords (5-7 words; separated from each other by semicolons);
Information about the author: Full name, academic degree (undergraduates, postgraduates, applicants indicate the university and department), position, place of work (city, organization, division), ORCID.
Contact information: includes postal business address, phone and e-mail;
Paragraphs 2-7 are also indicated in Russian.

The text of the article;
Illustrations and captions to them with the reflection of the name, dating, etc.;
A list of abbreviations (if any);
Literature (in English).
The research article should include the following sections (without highlighting them as such in the structure of the article):

introduction;
the experimental part;
discussion of the results;
conclusions;
list of literature.
The structure of the review article differs only in its content. All its sections reflect the author's intention.

The article does not allow hidden non-printable characters and other tricks that prevent you from checking the article for plagiarism.

Approximate requirements for the volume of articles:

Reviews: a critical summary of a research topic over a certain period of time (most often 5-10 years); 10-12 pages.
Research paper: the standard format for completed scientific research is 6-8 pages, with at least 10 sources (3-5 of them from the last 5 years).
Submission of materials

The text of the article must be accompanied/filled in:

The article is in Doc and Pdf format (figures and diagrams will be guided by Pdf).
Application (Information about each author, including: surname, first name, patronymic; place of work; position; academic degree; academic title; e-mail address; working postal address, telephone, fax. It must be indicated with which of the authors it is necessary to correspond).
Copyright transfer agreement (the text of the agreement is posted on the journal's website).
Technical requirements for the article file

The article file must be prepared in Microsoft Word format. It is recommended to use the Times New Roman font, font size 11 pt, line spacing 1, indentation 1, width alignment.

Endnotes should not be used to create a list of references! Do not download archives! Only original files! You should not split the article into separate files (text, tables, figures, abstract)! If possible, all the necessary material should be sent in one file.

As additional files, you need/can download drawings in the original format, the copyright agreement (in pdf format).

Headlines. Headings are printed in capital letters.

Tables. The tables are arranged according to the text. Each table should have a thematic heading and, if there are several, an ordinal number (without the no. sign), which is referenced in the text "in Table 1" or "(Table 1)". All columns in the table should have short headings in the nominative singular or plural.

Abbreviations. Arbitrary shortening of words is not allowed. A gap in graphs is indicated by three dots in the absence of data, and a dash in the absence of a phenomenon.

Drawings. The drawings are placed according to the text of the article and are presented separately as files in jpeg graphic format, with a volume of at least 1 MB (Image resolution must be >300 dpi). Textual inscriptions in drawings should be avoided, replacing them with numeric symbols, the interpretation of which is given in the captions to the drawings. The caption to the drawing is required. In the text, each figure is referenced without the number "in Figure 3" or "(Fig. 3)".

The placement of the same material in the form of figures and tables is unacceptable!

Photos should be clear, high-contrast, with lots of semitones, and well-developed in detail.

Thanks. All thanks for the help in the work are placed and for financial support – at the end of the article.

List of literature

The list lists all the works in alphabetical order. The names of magazines cannot be abbreviated.

It is advisable to cite sources published over the past 20 years.

In the text of the article, references to sources are placed in parentheses and formatted as follows:

if the work has one author – (Frolova 1997: 215);
if the work has two authors – (Smith, White 2004);
if the work has more than two authors – (Overman et al. 1997: 59; Smith et al. 2007: 33);
for archival materials – (RGALI. F. 297. Op. 2. D. 90. L. 15-16).
Books by foreign authors

Moddelmog D., del Gizzo S. Ernest Hemingway in context. Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2013.
Articles in scientific journals

Boldyrev N. N. Conceptual space of cognitive linguistics // Questions of cognitive linguistics. 2004. No. 1. pp. 18-36.
Articles in collections

Kryuchkova N.V. Methods of studying the concept // Russian and comparative philology: state and prospects: Proceedings of the international scientific conference. Kazan: Kazan State University, 2004. pp.271-272.
Dissertations and abstracts of dissertations

Chernogrudova E.P. Headlines with precedent texts in modern journalism (based on the material of the central, regional and local press): Dis. ... Candidate of Philological Sciences. Voronezh, 2003.
Monographs

Arutyunova N.D. Logical analysis of language: Cultural concepts. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1991. 204 p.
Links to online sources

Galperin I.R. The Great English-Russian Dictionary. URL: http://bse.uaio.ru/ENGR79/11.htm (18.06.2021)
References

The second list of References should be formatted according to the APA rules.

Article preparation

When submitting a manuscript to the editorial office for review, the authors must agree with all of the following points. The manuscript can be returned to the authors if it does not match them.

No plagiarism in the text. The authors guarantee that this article, in whole or in part, has not been previously published, nor is it under review or in the process of publication in another publication. If the manuscript was previously submitted for review to other publications, but was not accepted for publication, be sure to indicate this in the cover letter, otherwise the editors may misinterpret the results of checking the text for unauthorized borrowings and reject the manuscript. Originality is at least 75 percent.
The correct format. The submitted manuscript file is in Microsoft Word or Pdf format - *.doc, *.docx, *.Pdf. During the preparation of the manuscript, all the editorial requirements for the design of the text were met, the manuscript was formatted in accordance with the instructions of the official website of the journal.
The accompanying documents. The authors have prepared/filled out a publication application and author questionnaires for submission to the editorial board.
Additional files. The authors have prepared
graphic files (photographs, images, graphs, etc. in high resolution) for transmission to the editorial office and undertake to upload them to the website during the submission of the manuscript;
data files that should be published together with the article in electronic form (primary data, database, statistical results).analysis, media materials, etc.).
Authorship:

The authors confirm that:

All participants who have made significant contributions to the study are represented as Co-authors.;
Those who did not participate in the study are not listed as co-authors.;
All the co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the work and agreed to submit it for publication (this is confirmed by the signatures of all the authors in the cover letter).

The Journal's Code of Ethics

1. Introduction

1.1. The publication of materials in peer-reviewed journals is not only an easy way of scientific communication, but also makes a significant contribution to the development of the relevant field of scientific knowledge. Thus, it is important to set standards for the future ethical behavior of all parties involved in the publication, namely: authors, editors, reviewers, publishers and the scientific community for the journal Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin.

1.2. The publisher not only supports scientific communication and invests in this process, but is also responsible for following all current recommendations in the published work.

1.3. The publisher undertakes obligations for the strictest supervision of scientific materials. Our journal programs provide an unbiased account of the development of scientific thought and research, so we are also aware of the responsibility to properly present these reports, especially in terms of the ethical aspects of the publications outlined in this document.

2. Duties of editors

2.1. Decision on publication

The editor-in-chief of the scientific journal Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin is personally and independently responsible for making decisions on publication, often in collaboration with the relevant scientific society. The reliability of the work in question and its scientific significance should always underlie the decision to publish. The editor-in-Chief may be guided by the policy of the editorial board of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin journal, being limited by current legal requirements regarding libel, copyright, legality and plagiarism.

The Editor-in-Chief may confer with other editors and reviewers (or officials of the scientific society) during the decision on publication.

2.2. Decency

The editor should evaluate the intellectual content of the manuscripts regardless of the race, gender, religious beliefs, origin, citizenship or political preferences of the authors.

2.3. Confidentiality

The editor-in-chief and the editorial board of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin journal are obligated not to disclose information about the accepted manuscript unnecessarily to all persons, with the exception of the authors, reviewers, possible reviewers, other scientific consultants and the publisher.

2.4. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

2.4.1. Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts may not be used in personal research without the written consent of the author. Information or ideas obtained during the review process and related to possible benefits should remain confidential and not be used for personal gain.

2.4.2. Editors should recuse themselves from reviewing manuscripts (namely, request a co-editor, assistant editor, or collaborate with other members of the editorial board when reviewing the work instead of reviewing and deciding on it themselves) in the event of conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative, and other interactions and relationships with authors, companies, and possibly other organizations. related to the manuscript.

2.5. Supervision of publications

An editor who has provided convincing evidence that the statements or conclusions presented in the publication are erroneous should inform the publisher (and/or the relevant scientific society) about this in order to notify them as soon as possible of changes, withdrawal of the publication, expression of concern and other relevant statements.

2.6. Engagement and collaboration in research

The editor, together with the publisher (or the scientific society), takes adequate response measures in case of ethical claims concerning the reviewed manuscripts or published materials. Such measures generally include interaction with the authors of the manuscript and argumentation of the relevant complaint or claim, as well as with relevant organizations and research centers.

3. Responsibilities of reviewers

3.1. Influence on the decisions of the Editorial Board

Peer review is a necessary link in formal scientific communication, located at the very "heart" of the scientific approach. Reviewing helps the editor-in-chief make a decision about publication and, through appropriate interaction with the authors, can also help improve the quality of their work. The publisher shares the view that all scientists who want to contribute to the publication are required to do substantial work on reviewing the manuscript.

3.2. Compliance

Any selected reviewer who feels insufficiently qualified to review the manuscript or does not have enough time to complete the work quickly should notify the editor-in-chief of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin and ask to be excluded from the review process of the relevant manuscript.

3.3. Confidentiality

Any manuscript received for review should be treated as a confidential document. This work should not be opened or discussed with anyone who is not authorized to do so by the editor.

3.4. Requirements for the manuscript and objectivity

The reviewer is obliged to give an objective assessment. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable. Reviewers should express their opinions clearly and reasonably.

3.5. Recognition of primary sources

Reviewers should identify significant published works that correspond to the topic and are not included in the bibliography of the manuscript. Any statement (observation, conclusion, or argument) published earlier should have a corresponding bibliographic reference in the manuscript. The reviewer should also draw the editor's attention to the discovery of significant similarities or coincidences between the manuscript under consideration and any other published work within the reviewer's scientific competence.

3.6. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

3.6.1. Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts may not be used in personal research without the written consent of the author. Information or ideas obtained during the review process and related to possible benefits should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

3.6.2. Reviewers should not participate in the review of manuscripts in case of conflicts of interest due to competitive, joint and other interactions and relationships with any of the authors, companies or other organizations related to the submitted work.

4. Responsibilities of the authors

4.1. Requirements for manuscripts

4.1.1. The authors of the report on the original research should provide reliable results of the work done and an objective discussion of the significance of the research. The data underlying the work must be presented accurately. The work should contain sufficient details and bibliographic references for possible reproduction. False or knowingly erroneous statements are perceived as unethical behavior and unacceptable.

4.1.2. Reviews and scientific articles should also be accurate and objective, and the editorial board's point of view should be clearly indicated.

4.2. Data access and storage

The authors may be asked for the raw data relevant to the manuscript for review. Authors should be prepared to provide open access to this kind of information (according to the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if feasible, and in any case should retain this data for an adequate period of time after publication.

4.3. Originality and plagiarism

4.3.1. Authors should make sure that the article is completely original and, in case of using the works or statements of other authors, they are obliged to provide relevant bibliographic references or excerpts.

4.3.2. Plagiarism can exist in many forms, from presenting someone else's work as copyrighted to copying or paraphrasing essential parts of someone else's work (without attribution) to claiming one's own rights to the results of someone else's research. Plagiarism in all forms is unethical and unacceptable.

4.3.4. The publication of works containing plagiarism of text, ideas and/or data is excluded. Authors must submit completely original works for publication. References to the results of other authors' work should be accompanied by references to relevant sources, and citations of previously published texts should be written as direct speech with mandatory indication of the original source.

4.3.5. When reviewing an article, the Editorial Board of the journal verifies the material using the Anti-Plagiarism and Google Scholar systems. If an unauthorized borrowed text and graphic elements are identified, and the text has a low coefficient of originality, the editorial board has the right to demand that the authors correct the manuscript or refuse to publish it.

4.3.6. Plagiarism is also detected within the framework of open scientific peer review and after the publication of manuscripts – upon the readers' request. In case of discovery of unauthorized borrowings, the editorial board acts in accordance with the rules of the International Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). An article containing plagiarism may be withdrawn even after publication.

4.4. Multiplicity, redundancy and simultaneity of publications

4.4.1. In general, an author should not publish a manuscript, mostly devoted to the same research, in more than one journal as an original publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time is perceived as unethical behavior and unacceptable.

4.4.2. An author should not submit a previously published article for review in another journal.

4.4.3. The publication of a certain type of articles (for example, clinical recommendations, translated articles) in more than one journal is in some cases ethical under certain conditions. Authors and editors of interested journals should agree to a secondary publication that necessarily presents the same data and interpretations as in the first published work.

The bibliography of the primary work should also be presented in the second publication. More detailed information about acceptable forms of secondary (repeated) publications can be found on the page www.icmje.org .

4.5. Recognition of primary sources

It is always necessary to acknowledge the contributions of others. Authors should refer to publications that are relevant to the performance of the submitted work. Data obtained privately, for example, during a conversation, correspondence, or in the process of discussion with third parties, should not be used or presented without the express written permission of the original source. Information obtained from confidential sources, such as the evaluation of manuscripts or the provision of grants, should not be used without the express written permission of the authors of the work related to confidential sources.

4.6. Authorship of the publication

4.6.1. The authors of the publication may only be persons who have made a significant contribution to the formation of the idea of the work, the development, execution or interpretation of the submitted research. All those who have made significant contributions should be designated as co-authors. In cases where study participants have made significant contributions in a particular area of the research project, they should be listed as individuals who have made significant contributions to this study.

4.6.2. The author must make sure that all participants who have made significant contributions to the study are represented as co-authors and not those who did not participate in the study are listed as co-authors, as well as that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the work and agreed to submit it for publication.

4.7. Risks, as well as people and animals acting as objects of research

4.7.1. If the work involves the use of chemical products, procedures, or equipment that may pose an unusual risk, the author should clearly indicate this in the manuscript.

4.7.2. If animals or humans are expected to participate in the work as research objects, the authors should indicate in the manuscript that all stages of the study comply with the legislation and regulatory documents of research organizations, as well as approved by the relevant committees. The manuscript should clearly reflect that informed consent has been obtained from all people who have become research subjects. It is always necessary to ensure that the rights to privacy are respected.

4.8. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

4.8.1. All authors are required to disclose in their manuscripts financial or other existing conflicts of interest that may be perceived as having an impact on the results or conclusions presented in the work.

4.8.2. Examples of potential conflicts of interest that must be disclosed include employment, consulting, joint-stock ownership, receiving royalties, providing expert opinions, patent applications or patent registration, grants, and other financial support. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed as early as possible.

4.9. Significant errors in published works

If the author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in the publication, the author must inform the editor of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin and assist in the speedy withdrawal of the publication or correction of errors. If the editor or publisher has received information from a third party that the publication contains significant errors, the author is obliged to withdraw the work or correct the errors as soon as possible.

5. Responsibilities of the publishing house

5.1. The publisher must follow the principles and procedures that facilitate the performance of ethical duties by editors, reviewers and authors of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin journal in accordance with these requirements. The publisher must be sure that the potential profit from advertising or reprint production has not influenced the editors' decisions.

5.2. The publishing house should provide support to the editors of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin journal in reviewing claims to the ethical aspects of published materials and help them interact with other journals and/or publishers if this contributes to the performance of their duties by editors.

5.3. The Publisher should promote good research practices and implement industry standards in order to improve ethical guidelines, procedures for the removal and correction of errors.

5.4. The Publisher must provide appropriate specialized legal support (opinion or advice), if necessary.

The section is based on the materials of the Elsevier Scientific and Medical literature publishing house and materials The International Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Submission of materials

The text of the article must be accompanied/filled in:

The article is in Doc and Pdf format (figures and diagrams will be guided by Pdf).
Application (Information about each author, including: surname, first name, patronymic; place of work; position; academic degree; academic title; e-mail address; working postal address, telephone, fax. It must be indicated with which of the authors it is necessary to correspond).
Copyright transfer agreement (the text of the agreement is posted on the journal's website).
Article review procedure

After receiving the article, it is reviewed (double-blind), then the editorial board gives a conclusion on the expediency of publishing the submitted message. The full review period is at least 1 month.

Reviewing
All applications for publication submitted to the editorial office must be double-blind reviewed (the reviewer does not know the author of the manuscript, the author of the manuscript does not know the reviewer).

Articles are reviewed by both members of the editorial board and invited reviewers, leading experts in the relevant field of science.

The decision on the choice of the reviewer is made by the responsible editor.

In case of a conflict of interest, the reviewer has the right to refuse to conduct an expert examination of the article.

The review period is 2 weeks, but it can be extended at the request of the reviewer.

Based on the results of the review of the manuscript, the reviewer makes the following recommendations:

The article is recommended for publication in its present form.;
The article can be published after correcting the shortcomings noted by the reviewer.;
The article needs additional review by another specialist.;
the article cannot be published in the journal.
If the review contains recommendations for correcting and finalizing the article, the editorial board sends the author the text of the review with a proposal to take them into account when preparing a new version of the article or to refute them (partially or completely). The revised article is re-submitted for review.

The revision of the article should take no more than 2 weeks from the moment the author is notified of the need to make changes. Upon the expiration of this period, the author is notified of the withdrawal of the manuscript from consideration for publication. If the author refuses to finalize the article, he must notify the editorial board in writing of his decision.

An article that is not recommended for publication is not accepted for reconsideration.

The presence of a positive review is not a sufficient reason for the publication of the article. The final decision on publication is made at a meeting of the editorial board. In any conflict situations, the final decision is made by the editor-in-chief.

After the editorial board decides to allow the article to be published, the editorial board informs the author about it, indicating the possible publication dates.

The reviews are kept in the editorial office of the journal for 5 years, during which they can be submitted to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation if requested.

All applications for publication submitted to the editorial office must be double-blind reviewed (the reviewer does not know the author of the manuscript, the author of the manuscript does not know the reviewer).

Articles are reviewed by both members of the editorial board and invited reviewers, leading experts in the relevant field of science.

The decision on the choice of the reviewer is made by the responsible editor.

In case of a conflict of interest, the reviewer has the right to refuse to conduct an expert examination of the article.

The review period is 2 weeks, but it can be extended at the request of the reviewer.

Based on the results of the review of the manuscript, the reviewer makes the following recommendations:

The article is recommended for publication in its present form.;
The article can be published after correcting the shortcomings noted by the reviewer.;
The article needs additional review by another specialist.;
the article cannot be published in the journal.
If the review contains recommendations for correcting and finalizing the article, the editorial board sends the author the text of the review with a proposal to take them into account when preparing a new version of the article or to refute them (partially or completely). The revised article is re-submitted for review.

The revision of the article should take no more than 2 weeks from the moment the author is notified of the need to make changes. Upon expiration of this period, the author is notified accordingly of the withdrawal of the manuscript from consideration for publication. If the author refuses to finalize the article, he must notify the editorial board in writing of his decision.

An article that is not recommended for publication is not accepted for reconsideration.

The presence of a positive review is not a sufficient reason for the publication of the article. The final decision on publication is made at a meeting of the editorial board. In any conflict situations, the final decision is made by the editor-in-chief.

After the editorial board decides to allow the article to be published, the editorial board informs the author about it, indicating the possible publication dates.

The reviews are kept in the editorial office of the journal for 5 years, during which they can be submitted to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation if requested.

Redakciya zhurnala Nizhnevartovskiy filologicheskiy vestnik stremitsya podderzhivat' celostnost' nauchnoy kommunikacii i publikuet takie tipy statey, kak «Oshibki», «Dopolneniya», a tak zhe provodit retragirovanie statey — v zavisimosti ot konkretnoy situacii, v sootvetstvii s Rukovodstvom po retragirovaniyu statey COPE (Commette on Publication Ethics). Vo vseh sluchayah eti deystviya provodyatsya v otnoshenii ranee opublikovannyh statey.

V sootvetstvii s pravilami Soveta po etike nauchnyh publikaciy Associacii nauchnyh redaktorov i izdateley osnovaniyami dlya otzyva stat'i yavlyayutsya:

• obnaruzhenie v stat'e plagiata;
• obnaruzhenie v rabote fal'sifikaciy (naprimer, podtasovki eksperimental'nyh dannyh);
• obnaruzhenie v rabote ser'eznyh oshibok, stavyaschih pod somnenie ee nauchnuyu cennost';
• nekorrektnyy sostav avtorov;
• dublirovanie stat'i v neskol'kih izdaniyah;
• perepublikaciya stat'i bez soglasiya avtora;
• skrytie konflikta interesov i inye narusheniya publikacionnoy etiki;
• ne prohozhdenie stat'ey procedury recenzirovaniya.

Posle prinyatiya resheniya ob otzyve stat'i redakciya informiruet o svoem reshenii ee avtorov, ukazav prichinu retrakcii i ee datu. Stat'ya ostaetsya na sayte zhurnala v sostave sootvetstvuyuschego nomera, no poluchaet pometku «otozvana» s datoy retrakcii (pometka stavitsya poverh teksta stat'i i v oglavlenii nomera), a v razdele novostey sayta razmeschaetsya soobschenie o retrakcii. Informaciyu o retrakcii stat'i glavnyy redaktor zhurnala takzhe podaet vo vse setevye biblioteki i bazy dannyh, v kotoryh indeksiruetsya zhurnal.

Bolee podrobnuyu informaciyu o pravilah, kotoryh priderzhivaetsya redakciya zhurnala Nizhnevartovskiy filologicheskiy vestnik v otnoshenii rassmatrivaemyh sluchaev, mozhno nayti v razdele "Principy publikacionnoy etiki" (sm. vyshe).

Informaciyu o Rukovodstve po retragirovaniyu COPE mozhno nayti zdes': Rekomendacii po retragirovaniyu

The electronic version of the journal is distributed on the Internet under open access conditions. A subscription to the journal is not required to access the published articles in electronic form on the journal's website.

There is no publication fee.

By submitting an article for publication in this journal, the author agrees with the following:

The authors retain the copyright to the work and grant the journal the right to publish the work for the first time under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which allows others to distribute this work with mandatory preservation of links to the authors of the original work and the original publication in this journal.
The authors reserve the right to enter into separate contractual arrangements regarding the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published here (for example, its placement in the institute's repository, publication in a book), with reference to its original publication in this journal.
Authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (for example, in an institute repository or personal website) before and during the review process by this journal, as this can lead to a productive discussion and more links to this work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The manuscript sent by the authors to the editorial office is accepted for publication only by the decision of the editorial board and the editor-in-chief. In their decisions, the editorial board and the editor-in-chief rely on the conclusions of the reviewers received during the review of the article. You can find out more about the review procedure here.
When publishing in this journal, the authors jointly grant the Publisher the right to use the work under a simple (non-exclusive) license in the following ways::

reproduction of the Article or its separate part, as well as the metadata of the article in Russian and English in any material form, including on paper and electronic media as a separate work in journals and/or databases (local or on the Internet) Publisher and/or other persons, at the discretion of the Publisher;
distribution of the Article or its separate part, as well as the metadata of the article in Russian and English on any medium in the Journal and/or databases of the Publisher or other persons, at the discretion of the Publisher, or as an independent work worldwide on open access or subscription terms without remuneration to the Author;
making the Article or its separate part, as well as the metadata of the article in Russian and English, publicly available so that anyone can access the Article from anywhere and at any time of their choice (including via the Internet);
to grant permission for the use of the Article and its individual parts, as well as the metadata of the article in Russian and English, to third parties with notification of the Author by posting relevant information on the Journal's website without remuneration to the Author.;
processing, including the translation of the Article (including into foreign languages), and the use of the processed (translated) Articles using the above methods;
other rights not directly transferred to the Publisher under this Agreement, including patent rights for any processes, methods or techniques described by the Author in the Article, as well as trademark rights, are reserved for the Author.

The journal publishes the results of original scientific research and review articles on the most pressing issues of modern philological science: linguistics, literary studies, communication studies, and methods of teaching philological disciplines.

Main directions:

Russian philology.
Foreign philology.
Methods of teaching philological disciplines.

General linguistics.
Theory of literature.

The editorial board of a scientific journal guarantees consideration of all materials submitted for publication, respect for editorial independence and integrity in making objective decisions without prejudice to authors based on national or religious affiliation, official position; regardless of commercial interests and relationships; basing its policy on respect for the personal rights of the author and intellectual property rights.

Implements a policy to ensure and improve the quality of published materials, making a significant contribution to the development of domestic and foreign science (field of knowledge); takes measures to enhance activities to improve the quality of published material; strives to meet the needs of readers and authors.

It establishes the relevance, importance, clarity, reliability, and validity of the published research material as the guiding principles of editorial activity.

The main principles of highly qualified published research materials include:

thoroughness: the published research results must be carried out efficiently and carefully in accordance with ethical and legal standards; the authors are collectively responsible for their work and the content of the publication.;
Honesty: Authors should present the results honestly, without fabricating, falsifying or unscrupulous manipulation of data.;
Unambiguity: the publication should provide sufficient information for other researchers to repeat their experiments.;
completeness of the submitted materials: the review and conclusions from existing studies should be complete, balanced and should include information regardless of whether they support the hypotheses and interpretations of the author of the publication or not.;
Reasonableness: The results of a new study should be presented in the context of the results of previous studies.;
Originality: the authors guarantee that the proposed work is original and has not been previously published anywhere in any language; the work cannot be sent to several publications at the same time.;
Transparency: The publication should include all sources of research funding, including direct and indirect financial support, provision of equipment or materials, and other types of support (including assistance from statistical data scientists or technical writers).
The editorial board of the journal Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin pursues a policy of systematic improvement of the journal.

The journal is intended for researchers, specialists, university professors, graduate students and graduate students specializing in philology.

One of the main directions of the journal's policy is the publication of original articles that meet the standards of high scientific quality. The journal accepts research and review articles for publication.

Discussion articles are welcome.

The article is submitted to the editorial office of the journal through a personal account on the journal's website. Sending the article as a hard copy is not required!

All accompanying documents that contain a signature and/or seal are uploaded in scanned form.

To increase the "visibility" of authors, it is recommended that they submit their ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID)) IDs when submitting an article. http://www.orcid.org/).

When submitting an article, the author confirms that the article has not been published before and is under review in another journal. Simultaneous submission ("fan mail") of a manuscript to different journals is considered a serious violation of ethical standards. The identification of duplicated publications may lead to the refusal to accept the manuscripts of these authors, as well as to the retrogression (recall) of already published duplicated articles.

The language of the journal (we accept and publish articles) is Russian and English.

If the main language of the article is Russian, then the article must have an English translation of the title, abstract, keywords, and information about the author(s).

If the main language is English, then the article should have a Russian translation of the title, abstract, keywords, and information about the author(s).

Article review procedure

After receiving the article, it is reviewed (double-blind), then the editorial board gives a conclusion on the expediency of publishing the submitted message. The full review period is at least 1 month.

The structure of the article in Russian:

UDC code;
Last Name, First name, Patronymic, of the author(s);
Article title;
Abstract (200-250 words); the abstract should contain the following information: the purpose and objectives of scientific research; methodology and scientific approaches, the main results obtained; conclusions; originality / value of the data obtained; practical significance; direction of further research.
Keywords (5-7 words; separated from each other by semicolons);
Information about the author: Full name, academic degree (undergraduates, postgraduates, applicants indicate the university and department), position, place of work (city, organization, division), ORCID.
Contact information: includes postal business address, phone and e-mail;
Paragraphs 2-7 are also indicated in English.

The text of the article;
Illustrations and captions to them with the reflection of the name, dating, etc.;
A list of abbreviations (if any);
Literature (in Russian).
The structure of the article in English:

UDC code;
First name, patronymic, surname of the author(s);
Article title;
Abstract (200-250 words); the abstract should contain the following information: the purpose and objectives of scientific research; methodology and scientific approaches, the main results obtained; conclusions; originality / value of the data obtained; practical significance; direction of further research.
Keywords (5-7 words; separated from each other by semicolons);
Information about the author: Full name, academic degree (undergraduates, postgraduates, applicants indicate the university and department), position, place of work (city, organization, division), ORCID.
Contact information: includes postal business address, phone and e-mail;
Paragraphs 2-7 are also indicated in Russian.

The text of the article;
Illustrations and captions to them with the reflection of the name, dating, etc.;
A list of abbreviations (if any);
Literature (in English).
The research article should include the following sections (without highlighting them as such in the structure of the article):

introduction;
the experimental part;
discussion of the results;
conclusions;
list of literature.
The structure of the review article differs only in its content. All its sections reflect the author's intention.

The article does not allow hidden non-printable characters and other tricks that prevent you from checking the article for plagiarism.

Approximate requirements for the volume of articles:

Reviews: a critical summary of a research topic over a certain period of time (most often 5-10 years); 10-12 pages.
Research paper: the standard format for completed scientific research is 6-8 pages, with at least 10 sources (3-5 of them from the last 5 years).
Submission of materials

The text of the article must be accompanied/filled in:

The article is in Doc and Pdf format (figures and diagrams will be guided by Pdf).
Application (Information about each author, including: surname, first name, patronymic; place of work; position; academic degree; academic title; e-mail address; working postal address, telephone, fax. It must be indicated with which of the authors it is necessary to correspond).
Copyright transfer agreement (the text of the agreement is posted on the journal's website).
Technical requirements for the article file

The article file must be prepared in Microsoft Word format. It is recommended to use the Times New Roman font, font size 11 pt, line spacing 1, indentation 1, width alignment.

Endnotes should not be used to create a list of references! Do not download archives! Only original files! You should not split the article into separate files (text, tables, figures, abstract)! If possible, all the necessary material should be sent in one file.

As additional files, you need/can download drawings in the original format, the copyright agreement (in pdf format).

Headlines. Headings are printed in capital letters.

Tables. The tables are arranged according to the text. Each table should have a thematic heading and, if there are several, an ordinal number (without the no. sign), which is referenced in the text "in Table 1" or "(Table 1)". All columns in the table should have short headings in the nominative singular or plural.

Abbreviations. Arbitrary shortening of words is not allowed. A gap in graphs is indicated by three dots in the absence of data, and a dash in the absence of a phenomenon.

Drawings. The drawings are placed according to the text of the article and are presented separately as files in jpeg graphic format, with a volume of at least 1 MB (Image resolution must be >300 dpi). Textual inscriptions in drawings should be avoided, replacing them with numeric symbols, the interpretation of which is given in the captions to the drawings. The caption to the drawing is required. In the text, each figure is referenced without the number "in Figure 3" or "(Fig. 3)".

The placement of the same material in the form of figures and tables is unacceptable!

Photos should be clear, high-contrast, with lots of semitones, and well-developed in detail.

Thanks. All thanks for the help in the work are placed and for financial support – at the end of the article.

List of literature

The list lists all the works in alphabetical order. The names of magazines cannot be abbreviated.

It is advisable to cite sources published over the past 20 years.

In the text of the article, references to sources are placed in parentheses and formatted as follows:

if the work has one author – (Frolova 1997: 215);
if the work has two authors – (Smith, White 2004);
if the work has more than two authors – (Overman et al. 1997: 59; Smith et al. 2007: 33);
for archival materials – (RGALI. F. 297. Op. 2. D. 90. L. 15-16).
Books by foreign authors

Moddelmog D., del Gizzo S. Ernest Hemingway in context. Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2013.
Articles in scientific journals

Boldyrev N. N. Conceptual space of cognitive linguistics // Questions of cognitive linguistics. 2004. No. 1. pp. 18-36.
Articles in collections

Kryuchkova N.V. Methods of studying the concept // Russian and comparative philology: state and prospects: Proceedings of the international scientific conference. Kazan: Kazan State University, 2004. pp.271-272.
Dissertations and abstracts of dissertations

Chernogrudova E.P. Headlines with precedent texts in modern journalism (based on the material of the central, regional and local press): Dis. ... Candidate of Philological Sciences. Voronezh, 2003.
Monographs

Arutyunova N.D. Logical analysis of language: Cultural concepts. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1991. 204 p.
Links to online sources

Galperin I.R. The Great English-Russian Dictionary. URL: http://bse.uaio.ru/ENGR79/11.htm (18.06.2021)
References

The second list of References should be formatted according to the APA rules.

Article preparation

When submitting a manuscript to the editorial office for review, the authors must agree with all of the following points. The manuscript can be returned to the authors if it does not match them.

No plagiarism in the text. The authors guarantee that this article, in whole or in part, has not been previously published, nor is it under review or in the process of publication in another publication. If the manuscript was previously submitted for review to other publications, but was not accepted for publication, be sure to indicate this in the cover letter, otherwise the editors may misinterpret the results of checking the text for unauthorized borrowings and reject the manuscript. Originality is at least 75 percent.
The correct format. The submitted manuscript file is in Microsoft Word or Pdf format - *.doc, *.docx, *.Pdf. During the preparation of the manuscript, all the editorial requirements for the design of the text were met, the manuscript was formatted in accordance with the instructions of the official website of the journal.
The accompanying documents. The authors have prepared/filled out a publication application and author questionnaires for submission to the editorial board.
Additional files. The authors have prepared
graphic files (photographs, images, graphs, etc. in high resolution) for transmission to the editorial office and undertake to upload them to the website during the submission of the manuscript;
data files that should be published together with the article in electronic form (primary data, database, statistical results).analysis, media materials, etc.).
Authorship:

The authors confirm that:

All participants who have made significant contributions to the study are represented as Co-authors.;
Those who did not participate in the study are not listed as co-authors.;
All the co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the work and agreed to submit it for publication (this is confirmed by the signatures of all the authors in the cover letter).

The Journal's Code of Ethics

1. Introduction

1.1. The publication of materials in peer-reviewed journals is not only an easy way of scientific communication, but also makes a significant contribution to the development of the relevant field of scientific knowledge. Thus, it is important to set standards for the future ethical behavior of all parties involved in the publication, namely: authors, editors, reviewers, publishers and the scientific community for the journal Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin.

1.2. The publisher not only supports scientific communication and invests in this process, but is also responsible for following all current recommendations in the published work.

1.3. The publisher undertakes obligations for the strictest supervision of scientific materials. Our journal programs provide an unbiased account of the development of scientific thought and research, so we are also aware of the responsibility to properly present these reports, especially in terms of the ethical aspects of the publications outlined in this document.

2. Duties of editors

2.1. Decision on publication

The editor-in-chief of the scientific journal Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin is personally and independently responsible for making decisions on publication, often in collaboration with the relevant scientific society. The reliability of the work in question and its scientific significance should always underlie the decision to publish. The editor-in-Chief may be guided by the policy of the editorial board of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin journal, being limited by current legal requirements regarding libel, copyright, legality and plagiarism.

The Editor-in-Chief may confer with other editors and reviewers (or officials of the scientific society) during the decision on publication.

2.2. Decency

The editor should evaluate the intellectual content of the manuscripts regardless of the race, gender, religious beliefs, origin, citizenship or political preferences of the authors.

2.3. Confidentiality

The editor-in-chief and the editorial board of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin journal are obligated not to disclose information about the accepted manuscript unnecessarily to all persons, with the exception of the authors, reviewers, possible reviewers, other scientific consultants and the publisher.

2.4. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

2.4.1. Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts may not be used in personal research without the written consent of the author. Information or ideas obtained during the review process and related to possible benefits should remain confidential and not be used for personal gain.

2.4.2. Editors should recuse themselves from reviewing manuscripts (namely, request a co-editor, assistant editor, or collaborate with other members of the editorial board when reviewing the work instead of reviewing and deciding on it themselves) in the event of conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative, and other interactions and relationships with authors, companies, and possibly other organizations. related to the manuscript.

2.5. Supervision of publications

An editor who has provided convincing evidence that the statements or conclusions presented in the publication are erroneous should inform the publisher (and/or the relevant scientific society) about this in order to notify them as soon as possible of changes, withdrawal of the publication, expression of concern and other relevant statements.

2.6. Engagement and collaboration in research

The editor, together with the publisher (or the scientific society), takes adequate response measures in case of ethical claims concerning the reviewed manuscripts or published materials. Such measures generally include interaction with the authors of the manuscript and argumentation of the relevant complaint or claim, as well as with relevant organizations and research centers.

3. Responsibilities of reviewers

3.1. Influence on the decisions of the Editorial Board

Peer review is a necessary link in formal scientific communication, located at the very "heart" of the scientific approach. Reviewing helps the editor-in-chief make a decision about publication and, through appropriate interaction with the authors, can also help improve the quality of their work. The publisher shares the view that all scientists who want to contribute to the publication are required to do substantial work on reviewing the manuscript.

3.2. Compliance

Any selected reviewer who feels insufficiently qualified to review the manuscript or does not have enough time to complete the work quickly should notify the editor-in-chief of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin and ask to be excluded from the review process of the relevant manuscript.

3.3. Confidentiality

Any manuscript received for review should be treated as a confidential document. This work should not be opened or discussed with anyone who is not authorized to do so by the editor.

3.4. Requirements for the manuscript and objectivity

The reviewer is obliged to give an objective assessment. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable. Reviewers should express their opinions clearly and reasonably.

3.5. Recognition of primary sources

Reviewers should identify significant published works that correspond to the topic and are not included in the bibliography of the manuscript. Any statement (observation, conclusion, or argument) published earlier should have a corresponding bibliographic reference in the manuscript. The reviewer should also draw the editor's attention to the discovery of significant similarities or coincidences between the manuscript under consideration and any other published work within the reviewer's scientific competence.

3.6. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

3.6.1. Unpublished data obtained from submitted manuscripts may not be used in personal research without the written consent of the author. Information or ideas obtained during the review process and related to possible benefits should be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

3.6.2. Reviewers should not participate in the review of manuscripts in case of conflicts of interest due to competitive, joint and other interactions and relationships with any of the authors, companies or other organizations related to the submitted work.

4. Responsibilities of the authors

4.1. Requirements for manuscripts

4.1.1. The authors of the report on the original research should provide reliable results of the work done and an objective discussion of the significance of the research. The data underlying the work must be presented accurately. The work should contain sufficient details and bibliographic references for possible reproduction. False or knowingly erroneous statements are perceived as unethical behavior and unacceptable.

4.1.2. Reviews and scientific articles should also be accurate and objective, and the editorial board's point of view should be clearly indicated.

4.2. Data access and storage

The authors may be asked for the raw data relevant to the manuscript for review. Authors should be prepared to provide open access to this kind of information (according to the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if feasible, and in any case should retain this data for an adequate period of time after publication.

4.3. Originality and plagiarism

4.3.1. Authors should make sure that the article is completely original and, in case of using the works or statements of other authors, they are obliged to provide relevant bibliographic references or excerpts.

4.3.2. Plagiarism can exist in many forms, from presenting someone else's work as copyrighted to copying or paraphrasing essential parts of someone else's work (without attribution) to claiming one's own rights to the results of someone else's research. Plagiarism in all forms is unethical and unacceptable.

4.3.4. The publication of works containing plagiarism of text, ideas and/or data is excluded. Authors must submit completely original works for publication. References to the results of other authors' work should be accompanied by references to relevant sources, and citations of previously published texts should be written as direct speech with mandatory indication of the original source.

4.3.5. When reviewing an article, the Editorial Board of the journal verifies the material using the Anti-Plagiarism and Google Scholar systems. If an unauthorized borrowed text and graphic elements are identified, and the text has a low coefficient of originality, the editorial board has the right to demand that the authors correct the manuscript or refuse to publish it.

4.3.6. Plagiarism is also detected within the framework of open scientific peer review and after the publication of manuscripts – upon the readers' request. In case of discovery of unauthorized borrowings, the editorial board acts in accordance with the rules of the International Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). An article containing plagiarism may be withdrawn even after publication.

4.4. Multiplicity, redundancy and simultaneity of publications

4.4.1. In general, an author should not publish a manuscript, mostly devoted to the same research, in more than one journal as an original publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal at the same time is perceived as unethical behavior and unacceptable.

4.4.2. An author should not submit a previously published article for review in another journal.

4.4.3. The publication of a certain type of articles (for example, clinical recommendations, translated articles) in more than one journal is in some cases ethical under certain conditions. Authors and editors of interested journals should agree to a secondary publication that necessarily presents the same data and interpretations as in the first published work.

The bibliography of the primary work should also be presented in the second publication. More detailed information about acceptable forms of secondary (repeated) publications can be found on the page www.icmje.org .

4.5. Recognition of primary sources

It is always necessary to acknowledge the contributions of others. Authors should refer to publications that are relevant to the performance of the submitted work. Data obtained privately, for example, during a conversation, correspondence, or in the process of discussion with third parties, should not be used or presented without the express written permission of the original source. Information obtained from confidential sources, such as the evaluation of manuscripts or the provision of grants, should not be used without the express written permission of the authors of the work related to confidential sources.

4.6. Authorship of the publication

4.6.1. The authors of the publication may only be persons who have made a significant contribution to the formation of the idea of the work, the development, execution or interpretation of the submitted research. All those who have made significant contributions should be designated as co-authors. In cases where study participants have made significant contributions in a particular area of the research project, they should be listed as individuals who have made significant contributions to this study.

4.6.2. The author must make sure that all participants who have made significant contributions to the study are represented as co-authors and not those who did not participate in the study are listed as co-authors, as well as that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the work and agreed to submit it for publication.

4.7. Risks, as well as people and animals acting as objects of research

4.7.1. If the work involves the use of chemical products, procedures, or equipment that may pose an unusual risk, the author should clearly indicate this in the manuscript.

4.7.2. If animals or humans are expected to participate in the work as research objects, the authors should indicate in the manuscript that all stages of the study comply with the legislation and regulatory documents of research organizations, as well as approved by the relevant committees. The manuscript should clearly reflect that informed consent has been obtained from all people who have become research subjects. It is always necessary to ensure that the rights to privacy are respected.

4.8. Disclosure Policy and Conflicts of Interest

4.8.1. All authors are required to disclose in their manuscripts financial or other existing conflicts of interest that may be perceived as having an impact on the results or conclusions presented in the work.

4.8.2. Examples of potential conflicts of interest that must be disclosed include employment, consulting, joint-stock ownership, receiving royalties, providing expert opinions, patent applications or patent registration, grants, and other financial support. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed as early as possible.

4.9. Significant errors in published works

If the author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in the publication, the author must inform the editor of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin and assist in the speedy withdrawal of the publication or correction of errors. If the editor or publisher has received information from a third party that the publication contains significant errors, the author is obliged to withdraw the work or correct the errors as soon as possible.

5. Responsibilities of the publishing house

5.1. The publisher must follow the principles and procedures that facilitate the performance of ethical duties by editors, reviewers and authors of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin journal in accordance with these requirements. The publisher must be sure that the potential profit from advertising or reprint production has not influenced the editors' decisions.

5.2. The publishing house should provide support to the editors of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin journal in reviewing claims to the ethical aspects of published materials and help them interact with other journals and/or publishers if this contributes to the performance of their duties by editors.

5.3. The Publisher should promote good research practices and implement industry standards in order to improve ethical guidelines, procedures for the removal and correction of errors.

5.4. The Publisher must provide appropriate specialized legal support (opinion or advice), if necessary.

The section is based on the materials of the Elsevier Scientific and Medical literature publishing house and materials The International Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Submission of materials

The text of the article must be accompanied/filled in:

The article is in Doc and Pdf format (figures and diagrams will be guided by Pdf).
Application (Information about each author, including: surname, first name, patronymic; place of work; position; academic degree; academic title; e-mail address; working postal address, telephone, fax. It must be indicated with which of the authors it is necessary to correspond).
Copyright transfer agreement (the text of the agreement is posted on the journal's website).
Article review procedure

After receiving the article, it is reviewed (double-blind), then the editorial board gives a conclusion on the expediency of publishing the submitted message. The full review period is at least 1 month.

Reviewing
All applications for publication submitted to the editorial office must be double-blind reviewed (the reviewer does not know the author of the manuscript, the author of the manuscript does not know the reviewer).

Articles are reviewed by both members of the editorial board and invited reviewers, leading experts in the relevant field of science.

The decision on the choice of the reviewer is made by the responsible editor.

In case of a conflict of interest, the reviewer has the right to refuse to conduct an expert examination of the article.

The review period is 2 weeks, but it can be extended at the request of the reviewer.

Based on the results of the review of the manuscript, the reviewer makes the following recommendations:

The article is recommended for publication in its present form.;
The article can be published after correcting the shortcomings noted by the reviewer.;
The article needs additional review by another specialist.;
the article cannot be published in the journal.
If the review contains recommendations for correcting and finalizing the article, the editorial board sends the author the text of the review with a proposal to take them into account when preparing a new version of the article or to refute them (partially or completely). The revised article is re-submitted for review.

The revision of the article should take no more than 2 weeks from the moment the author is notified of the need to make changes. Upon the expiration of this period, the author is notified of the withdrawal of the manuscript from consideration for publication. If the author refuses to finalize the article, he must notify the editorial board in writing of his decision.

An article that is not recommended for publication is not accepted for reconsideration.

The presence of a positive review is not a sufficient reason for the publication of the article. The final decision on publication is made at a meeting of the editorial board. In any conflict situations, the final decision is made by the editor-in-chief.

After the editorial board decides to allow the article to be published, the editorial board informs the author about it, indicating the possible publication dates.

The reviews are kept in the editorial office of the journal for 5 years, during which they can be submitted to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation if requested.

Advertising and reprint placement policy
The editorial policy of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin in the field of advertising is based on the recommendations of the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME) Recommendations on Publication Ethics Policies for Medical Journals and the Law of the Russian Federation "On Advertising".

Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin magazine may receive income from advertising, which creates a potential conflict of interest. In order to avoid the impact of this circumstance on the publication process, the editorial board's decisions do not depend on the cost of advertising or the production of reprints. Advertisers and sponsors have no influence on the decisions of editorial boards and editorial boards, regardless of the terms of advertising or other agreements.
All advertising materials are subject to approval by the editorial staff of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin and the publishing house, which reserve the right to reject or cancel any advertisement at any time.
The functions and responsibilities of the editors of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin and the advertising managers of the publishing house do not overlap.
In scientific publications and on the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin website, it is prohibited to intentionally place advertisements next to articles about the company or the product that is the subject of the advertisement. Advertising content is designed differently from scientific and editorial publications, so that the difference between them is obvious.
The publishing house and editorial board of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin journal do not publish "promotional articles", materials from sponsors and/or advertisers must be clearly marked as advertising. If the materials were not reviewed or the review process was significantly different from that accepted in this journal, this should be clearly stated.
The editorial board of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin has the right to reject any advertisement that, in the opinion of the editorial board, is incompatible with its mission or does not meet the objectives of the journal./the website of the magazine or publishing house, and stop the process of publishing any previously approved advertisement. Advertisements are subject to approval by the editorial board of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin and other staff of the publishing house. No separate agreements can override this rule.
After placing an advertisement on the website of the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin on the Internet, it can be deleted at any time if the editor-in-chief or the staff of the publishing house demand its removal.
Advertising of the following categories of goods and services is prohibited:
alcohol;
tobacco;
cold steel and firearms, ammunition, explosive substances and methods of their manufacture;
gambling and lotteries;
pornography or related content;
political and religious advertising;
information about the availability of "miraculous" medicines or treatment methods;
ads containing unsubstantiated claims about the health benefits of the advertised products;
advertising aimed at children.
Advertisements should not be misleading and verifiable, and should clearly identify the advertiser and the product or service offered. Distortions, exaggerations or extravagant wording are not allowed in advertising. Promotional materials will not be accepted for publication if they look obscene or offensive, or if they relate to a personal, racial, ethnic, sexual or religious nature.
Advertising materials are accepted and published by the publisher subject to guarantees from the advertising agency and the advertiser that they have the appropriate rights and permissions to publish all the advertising content submitted for review.
By submitting the advertising materials for review, the advertiser and the advertising agency, jointly and separately, agree to be responsible (including financially) for any claims against the publisher, its officials, agents and employees and to compensate for costs and losses incurred as a result of the publication of the relevant advertisement and its content, including (including agree to act as defendants in cases of defamation, violation of confidentiality, copyright infringement or plagiarism).
Any mention of the publishing house and the Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin magazine, their products or services in advertising, promotional materials or goods by the advertiser or advertising agency requires the written permission of the publishing house.
Although the publisher welcomes the placement of advertisements with a large proportion of text content and data, advertisements should not look like scientific articles and peer-reviewed content; banners and logos of advertisers should be clearly distinguishable, and the advertising content itself may require special labeling. All advertising materials must clearly and unambiguously identify the advertiser by trademark and/or signature.
Reprints should be published only in the form in which they were originally published in the journal (including subsequent corrections), so there should be no additions or changes to them.
The publisher is not responsible for accidental or indirect damages due to errors in the display or printing of advertisements.
The advertisement published in the journal does not imply that the advertiser provided sponsorship to the journal or any influence on the authors of any article, the process of its review by the editorial board and the editorial decision on the possibility of publication in the journal/on the website.
The full rules of any market research or promotion related to the published advertisement must be reflected in this advertisement or available via a direct link.
The publisher does not use the following online advertising formats:
pop-up windows and floating ads;
advertisements that collect personal information from visitors without their knowledge or permission;
advertisements that block the reading of the magazine's website pages (in whole or in part) without the ability to hide advertising information or refuse to view it;
advertisements that redirect visitors to other sites without having to click on the corresponding banner ad.
The publisher's advertising policy is not exhaustive and may be changed at any time without prior notice.

The publisher cooperates with third-party advertising companies to display advertisements and/or collect certain information when visiting our website. These companies may use cookies or web beacons to collect non-personal information [not including your name, address, email address, or phone number] during your visit to this website in order to serve ads on other websites that may also be of interest to you.

To contact the publisher regarding the placement of advertisements in the magazine/On the website, please go to the contact page.

Publication in the journal Nizhnevartovsk Philological Bulletin is free for authors.

The editorial board does not charge the authors for the preparation, placement and printing of materials, posting on the website.

All applications for publication submitted to the editorial office must be double-blind reviewed (the reviewer does not know the author of the manuscript, the author of the manuscript does not know the reviewer).

Articles are reviewed by both members of the editorial board and invited reviewers, leading experts in the relevant field of science.

The decision on the choice of the reviewer is made by the responsible editor.

In case of a conflict of interest, the reviewer has the right to refuse to conduct an expert examination of the article.

The review period is 2 weeks, but it can be extended at the request of the reviewer.

Based on the results of the review of the manuscript, the reviewer makes the following recommendations:

The article is recommended for publication in its present form.;
The article can be published after correcting the shortcomings noted by the reviewer.;
The article needs additional review by another specialist.;
the article cannot be published in the journal.
If the review contains recommendations for correcting and finalizing the article, the editorial board sends the author the text of the review with a proposal to take them into account when preparing a new version of the article or to refute them (partially or completely). The revised article is re-submitted for review.

The revision of the article should take no more than 2 weeks from the moment the author is notified of the need to make changes. Upon expiration of this period, the author is notified accordingly of the withdrawal of the manuscript from consideration for publication. If the author refuses to finalize the article, he must notify the editorial board in writing of his decision.

An article that is not recommended for publication is not accepted for reconsideration.

The presence of a positive review is not a sufficient reason for the publication of the article. The final decision on publication is made at a meeting of the editorial board. In any conflict situations, the final decision is made by the editor-in-chief.

After the editorial board decides to allow the article to be published, the editorial board informs the author about it, indicating the possible publication dates.

The reviews are kept in the editorial office of the journal for 5 years, during which they can be submitted to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation if requested.

Redakciya zhurnala Nizhnevartovskiy filologicheskiy vestnik stremitsya podderzhivat' celostnost' nauchnoy kommunikacii i publikuet takie tipy statey, kak «Oshibki», «Dopolneniya», a tak zhe provodit retragirovanie statey — v zavisimosti ot konkretnoy situacii, v sootvetstvii s Rukovodstvom po retragirovaniyu statey COPE (Commette on Publication Ethics). Vo vseh sluchayah eti deystviya provodyatsya v otnoshenii ranee opublikovannyh statey.

V sootvetstvii s pravilami Soveta po etike nauchnyh publikaciy Associacii nauchnyh redaktorov i izdateley osnovaniyami dlya otzyva stat'i yavlyayutsya:

• obnaruzhenie v stat'e plagiata;
• obnaruzhenie v rabote fal'sifikaciy (naprimer, podtasovki eksperimental'nyh dannyh);
• obnaruzhenie v rabote ser'eznyh oshibok, stavyaschih pod somnenie ee nauchnuyu cennost';
• nekorrektnyy sostav avtorov;
• dublirovanie stat'i v neskol'kih izdaniyah;
• perepublikaciya stat'i bez soglasiya avtora;
• skrytie konflikta interesov i inye narusheniya publikacionnoy etiki;
• ne prohozhdenie stat'ey procedury recenzirovaniya.

Posle prinyatiya resheniya ob otzyve stat'i redakciya informiruet o svoem reshenii ee avtorov, ukazav prichinu retrakcii i ee datu. Stat'ya ostaetsya na sayte zhurnala v sostave sootvetstvuyuschego nomera, no poluchaet pometku «otozvana» s datoy retrakcii (pometka stavitsya poverh teksta stat'i i v oglavlenii nomera), a v razdele novostey sayta razmeschaetsya soobschenie o retrakcii. Informaciyu o retrakcii stat'i glavnyy redaktor zhurnala takzhe podaet vo vse setevye biblioteki i bazy dannyh, v kotoryh indeksiruetsya zhurnal.

Bolee podrobnuyu informaciyu o pravilah, kotoryh priderzhivaetsya redakciya zhurnala Nizhnevartovskiy filologicheskiy vestnik v otnoshenii rassmatrivaemyh sluchaev, mozhno nayti v razdele "Principy publikacionnoy etiki" (sm. vyshe).

Informaciyu o Rukovodstve po retragirovaniyu COPE mozhno nayti zdes': Rekomendacii po retragirovaniyu

There is no publication fee.

The electronic version of the journal is distributed on the Internet under open access conditions. A subscription to the journal is not required to access the published articles in electronic form on the journal's website.

The magazine is published once every six months: May, November. 

Deadline for submission of materials: until April 10 (May issue), until October 10 (November issue).

By submitting an article for publication in this journal, the author agrees with the following:

The authors retain the copyright to the work and grant the journal the right to publish the work for the first time under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which allows others to distribute this work with mandatory preservation of links to the authors of the original work and the original publication in this journal.
The authors reserve the right to enter into separate contractual arrangements regarding the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published here (for example, its placement in the institute's repository, publication in a book), with reference to its original publication in this journal.
Authors have the right to post their work on the Internet (for example, in an institute repository or personal website) before and during the review process by this journal, as this can lead to a productive discussion and more links to this work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The manuscript sent by the authors to the editorial office is accepted for publication only by the decision of the editorial board and the editor-in-chief. In their decisions, the editorial board and the editor-in-chief rely on the conclusions of the reviewers received during the review of the article. You can find out more about the review procedure here.
When publishing in this journal, the authors jointly grant the Publisher the right to use the work under a simple (non-exclusive) license in the following ways::

reproduction of the Article or its separate part, as well as the metadata of the article in Russian and English in any material form, including on paper and electronic media as a separate work in journals and/or databases (local or on the Internet) Publisher and/or other persons, at the discretion of the Publisher;
distribution of the Article or its separate part, as well as the metadata of the article in Russian and English on any medium in the Journal and/or databases of the Publisher or other persons, at the discretion of the Publisher, or as an independent work worldwide on open access or subscription terms without remuneration to the Author;
making the Article or its separate part, as well as the metadata of the article in Russian and English, publicly available so that anyone can access the Article from anywhere and at any time of their choice (including via the Internet);
to grant permission for the use of the Article and its individual parts, as well as the metadata of the article in Russian and English, to third parties with notification of the Author by posting relevant information on the Journal's website without remuneration to the Author.;
processing, including the translation of the Article (including into foreign languages), and the use of the processed (translated) Articles using the above methods;
other rights not directly transferred to the Publisher under this Agreement, including patent rights for any processes, methods or techniques described by the Author in the Article, as well as trademark rights, are reserved for the Author.

The journal provides instant open access to its content based on the principle that providing free public access to research promotes broader global knowledge exchange.

The Journal's articles are published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material if the author of the original work is cited properly.

Confidentiality
The editorial board of the journal and the administration of the journal's website do not transfer personal information specified by users in any way when working with the journal's website to third parties, except in those cases and to the extent specified in the terms of the copyright agreement.

The place of work and e-mail address of the authors of the accepted manuscript will be published in the "Information about the authors" section of the printed version of the journal and in the "About the authors" section on the article page on the journal's website.

The phone number of the author responsible for correspondence will be known only to the secretariat of the editorial board and will be used only if absolutely necessary.

Z F Abdulin Surgutskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet

Ya E Andreeva Tyumenskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet

T V Anikina Nizhny Tagil State Social Pedagogical Institute, branch of Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University

Yana Y. Arustamyan National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek

Anastasia V Akhmatzanova Raduzhninsky Polytechnic College

Dilyaram U. Ashurova Uzbek State University of World languages

Dilyaram U Ashurova Uzbek State University of World Languages

Dilyaram U Ashurova Uzbek State University of World languages

A Y. Bashkirtceva

A Y. Bashkirtceva

A N Bezrukov Bashkir State University (Branch in Birsk)

A N Bezrukov Bashkir State University (Branch in Birsk)

A N Bezrukov Bashkirskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet (Birskiy filial)

A N Bezrukov Bashkir State University (Branch in Birsk)

A N Bezrukov Bashkir State University (Branch in Birsk)

A. Bezrukov Bashkir State University

Andrei N Bezrukov Bashkir State University (Branch in Birsk)

Andrei N Bezrukov Ufa University of Science and Technology (Branch in Birsk)

Andrei N Bezrukov Ufa University of Science and Technology (Branch in Birsk)

Andrei N Bezrukov Ufa University of Science and Technology (Branch in Birsk)

• « 
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• …
• 15
•  »